Are You Happy or are You Gay?
Kenya has been labeled as the fifth most prejudiced countries when it comes to LGBIT rights. Homosexuals hide in the dark and fear exposing their orientation because of harassment and possible abuse. Even our very own Deputy President has been known to say there is no room for homosexuality in Kenya. He re-affirmed what most Africans countries believe - that being gay is unnatural and un-African. Many people believe it is a ‘white’ thing that is being forced upon us. The incident in 2010 where a mob attacked a number of men in Mombasa after accusing them of having gay sex shows just how deeply seated the stigma goes. They were then sentenced to prison for’ having unnatural sex against the order of nature’.
77 Countries Where Homosexuality is a Crime |
In 2014,
Kenyan MP’s proposed a bill which would have resulted in gays being stoned to
death if they were found out. They proposed that anyone charged with aggravated
homosexuality - performing a gay act when HIV positive or having AIDS - should
be publicly stoned to death. The Bill was later found to be unconstitutional
and was not passed. The fact that it was even proposed is quite shocking seeing
as these homosexuals are merely living out their preferred lifestyle. The
current status is a sentence of up to 14 years if one is caught performing
homosexual activities.
It is true that
the rate of HIV infections between homosexual men contributes up to 5% of all
new infections and is growing in Kenya
and this is worrying but this does not justify killing a man. This is further exacerbated by health care
facilities which refuse to offer treatment to patients if they find out they
are gay.
Another thing to note is the Bill would only have applied to men and
not women. There are probably as many lesbians as there are gays, so why should
only one gender be persecuted?
It has been
a persistent trend that lesbians are more tolerated than gays maybe as a result
of the sexualisation of lesbian sex by the porn industry. They are shown to be
sexy and erotic but do still attract discrimination.
The act of corrective rape which is prevalent mostly in South Africa is believed to ‘cure’ a lady of lesbianism and is often unreported. Sometimes the rapists will use crude objects such as sticks, knives and even bottles which leave the victim physically and emotionally wounded. The social impact of such actions is obviously negative, with women committing suicide, dealing with unwanted pregnancies and feelings of violation.
The act of corrective rape which is prevalent mostly in South Africa is believed to ‘cure’ a lady of lesbianism and is often unreported. Sometimes the rapists will use crude objects such as sticks, knives and even bottles which leave the victim physically and emotionally wounded. The social impact of such actions is obviously negative, with women committing suicide, dealing with unwanted pregnancies and feelings of violation.
The basis
that homosexuality is un-African is unfounded and a little research will reveal
this notion to be untrue. Funny enough, there is documented proof that there is
a history of ancient African homosexual activities between both men and women
alike. In the Zande culture of North Central Africa, young men were married off
to older men as temporary wives and a bride price was even paid for them.
In this very country which we call home, the Iteso tribe allowed and accepted men who had female tendencies and felt like women. They adopted female names, wore their clothes and did their daily jobs. In pre-colonial times, Kikuyus have a history of older men having explicit relationships with adolescent boys while Meru men were frequently homosexual and even married other men.
In this very country which we call home, the Iteso tribe allowed and accepted men who had female tendencies and felt like women. They adopted female names, wore their clothes and did their daily jobs. In pre-colonial times, Kikuyus have a history of older men having explicit relationships with adolescent boys while Meru men were frequently homosexual and even married other men.
Uganda,
which controversially passed a law dubbed “ Kill the gays bill” was ironically
home to known and accepted homosexual behavior among the Bahima, Banyoro and
Baganda tribes.
Furthermore, in the Lango tribe, transgender males were known as mukododako and were allowed to marry men and seen to be women by their fellow tribe members.
Furthermore, in the Lango tribe, transgender males were known as mukododako and were allowed to marry men and seen to be women by their fellow tribe members.
Traditional
African homosexuality went as far as to praise and honor homosexuals as discovered
by Portuguese priests in Angola. Priests in the Congo dressed as women and were
given respect and admiration. Homosexual intercourse was even used as a
‘medicine’ to promote wealth in Cameroon & Gabon.
So in
essence, in pre-colonial Africa, homosexuality was wildly practiced so why the
post-colonial push to make it illegal? Where did this notion that it is illegal
come from to make it illicit? The laws which first made homosexuality illegal
were enacted by colonialist governments and this is mostly prevalent in former
British colonies. One can even go as far as to say that it was not
homosexuality that was imported to Africa but rather homophobia. And now in this post- colonial era, the same
Western forces that imposed homophobic laws upon us now wish for us to
completely eradicate them and follow their example.
It could be true that Africa is resisting this push to assert their independence from Western influencers and not bow down to their sentiments in contrast to colonial times. Kind of like a child refusing to eat merely to disobey their parents and ignoring their hunger.
It could be true that Africa is resisting this push to assert their independence from Western influencers and not bow down to their sentiments in contrast to colonial times. Kind of like a child refusing to eat merely to disobey their parents and ignoring their hunger.
With Kenya
being a mostly Christian country, many arguments against homosexuality are
backed by Christian sentiments which in essence promote homophobia. Churches
often try to ‘convert’ homosexuals into ‘normal people’ and regularly ban them
from church services. They quote the Bible in their arguments but is this not
the same Bible which promotes love for everyone?
The
Christian and Muslim argument that homosexuality is against God’s rule is not
convincing enough to justify such harsh treatments of gays and lesbians. And
asserting that Christianity and homosexuality cannot coexist is proven wrong by
looking at Argentina which is a purely Catholic country yet they do not
criminalise the act. It is known that God would not expect or want Christians
to choose between their compassion and their faith. Although it is mentioned a
few times in the Bible, these widely spread Old Testament verses are used to
criticize and ultimately judge homosexuals.
Furthermore, Paul in the New Testament instructs Christians not to follow the writings in the Old Testament because they are weak and useless “for the law made nothing perfect”. How can Christians decide to choose one part of the Bible to justify homophobia but ignore other laws such as pork being forbidden and having tattoos?
Furthermore, Paul in the New Testament instructs Christians not to follow the writings in the Old Testament because they are weak and useless “for the law made nothing perfect”. How can Christians decide to choose one part of the Bible to justify homophobia but ignore other laws such as pork being forbidden and having tattoos?
When
Paul shuns homosexuals in the New Testament, it is necessary to understand the
context in which he is writing. Wealthy Romans used to buy slaves of the same
sex and forced them to perform sexual favours. Paul saw this and was disgusted
by the nature of the transaction and he would have condemned it even if it were
happening between man and woman. There was no concept of ‘gayness’ in his time
so he could not have been condemning homosexuality as an identity, rather the
wanton, predacious, non-consensual same-sex acts
between people whom he understood to be heterosexual.The word
homosexuality did not even exist in his time. Essentially, when taken out of
context, the Bible can be used to support or oppose any and every moral stance.
Kenya may
however be moving in a different direction with the recent ruling that the National
Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission can be registered and be recognized as
an NGO. This is in line with the Constitution which protects the right for
anyone to join associations of their own choice. The case of Andrew who then
became Audrey is also proof of a step in the way Kenyan law is moving in terms
of tolerating same sex relationships.
I, for one, am not for homosexuals or against them, but I will advocate for their rights
because they, just like you and me, are human beings. They have the right to
express themselves and choose their own ways of life be it with someone of the
same sex. I as a Kenyan am proud to be one but I will not and essentially,
cannot support outright discrimination even by any other name. Let them be.
Comments
Post a Comment